The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) is consulting on possible changes to the UK design framework with the aims of improving design validity, simplifying the regime, and protecting emerging forms of design.
READ MOREImplication of EPO decision on prior English court decision: Paul Harris, Head of Litigation at Dehns provides a case analysis of Vodafone Group PLC and ors v IPCom GmbH.
What better time to acknowledge the achievements of the women in our firm than the International day of Women and Girls in Science. In celebration of this day, our Senior Partner, Elizabeth Jones, discusses topics ranging from becoming a patent attorney to the importance of normalising the presence of women in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) fields.
In honour of International day of Women and Girls in Science, Dehns has interviewed a series of inspiring role models in our network.
Anne Ulvestad, CEO of Arctic Pharma AS, kindly opened up about her experiences in this industry, from her motivation for pursuing a career in STEM to her experience of barriers to entry.
Can adding the company name to a mark avoid infringement?: Lauren Palmer, Legal Assistant at Dehns provides a case analysis of Combe International v Dr Wolff
Arrow declaration misses its target: Paul Harris, Head of Litigation at Dehns, considers the extent to which the Patents Court will go in order to provide a “spin-off value” for one party, in the courts of another jurisdiction.
A balance must be struck between the competing interests of generic and innovator companies to ensure the healthcare system works at its best. At the moment, that longstanding balance has been disrupted by the Federal Circuit and the ripples are still being felt in the generics industry, even if the court has tried to take some of the sting out of its earlier actions.
In this episode of The IP Podcast, Senior Associate Daniel Rowe discusses a topic relating to the biotechnology and pharma industries: repurposed drugs and skinny labelling.
Tune in to hear Dan answer:
All these questions and more, answered in less than 20 minutes!
The contributions of both generic and innovator companies to our healthcare systems are essential, and a balance must be struck between their competing interests to ensure the system works at its best.
Read Neil Campbell’s latest thinking on how far a commercial product placed on the market becomes part of the state of the art. Neil will be speaking at LSPN in San Francisco on 1 November.
The purpose of patents is to drive innovation. However, many jurisdictions accept that a patent term of 20 years from filing is not always sufficient to compensate an innovator for the expense and risk of developing certain types of product. Many countries in Europe (including the UK despite its exit from the EU) have adopted an alternative approach to compensating for lost patent term. This new right is known as a “Supplementary Protection Certificate” (SPC) and although quite limited in scope, it can provide highly valuable protection since it comes into force at the expiry of the patent and is sharply focused on protecting the commercial produc
Subscribe here for updates on IP news, events and webinars.
|