UPC now open

Dehns is at the forefront of the UPC and is already involved in a number of high-profile cases, including both revocation and infringement actions. Unlike most other law firms, we have already attended UPC hearings at first instance and before the court of appeal.

Dehns currently has around 80 European Patent Attorneys able to represent parties in all proceedings before the UPC, and in whatever Division of the UPC the action is commenced. Contact our expert team if you need to enforce your rights, or formulate a defensive strategy.

 

 

Contact us
Click here to download our UPC Guide

What is the UPC?

The Unified Patent Court is a new supranational court in the European Union (EU). It has exclusive right to issue judgments in lawsuits involving Unitary Patents, for example with regard to questions of infringement or validity. It is also able to issue judgments relating to classical European patents unless these are “opted out” of the UPC. The UPC can also issue judgments relating to SPCs granted on the basis of a Unitary Patent. Its judgments are enforceable throughout all of the EU countries which have signed the Unified Patent Court Agreement.

The history of Unitary Patents

For many years it has been possible to obtain a single registered trade mark or registered design which covers the whole of the European Union (EU). For more than 10 years, the EU worked on providing an equivalent system for patents, and it is now possible to obtain a Unitary Patent (UP) as a single patent right covering the majority of EU countries.

Please note that these changes did not affect the long-standing process for applying for, and obtaining grant of, European patents at the European Patent Office (EPO).

The key features of Unitary Patents

Unitary Patents can be registered by the EPO following grant of a European patent. Whether or not you may wish to obtain grant of a UP will depend on a number of factors. Our patent experts have created a useful resource that outlines the different factors you need to consider when obtaining grant of a Unitary Patent.

A “request for unitary effect” must be filed at the EPO within one month of the grant of the European patent. For an initial transitional period of at least six (6) years, for European patents granted in English, a translation of the granted patent into one other EU language must also be filed when requesting unitary effect. For European patents granted in French or German, a translation of the granted patent into English must be filed.

A UP can now be obtained based on any European patent that reaches grant.

A UP obtained currently will cover 17 or 18 EU member states depending on the date of registration of the request for unitary effect* but UPs may eventually cover up to 24 of the 27 EU member states as further states that have signed the UPC Agreement complete its ratification. (A UP will not cover Croatia, Spain or Poland as they have not signed up to the UPC Agreement.)

Protection in non-EU countries, including UK, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey, is available via conventional national validation of a granted European patent.

A UP obtained currently will cover 18 EU member states* but UPs may eventually cover up to 24 of the 27 EU member states, following their ratification. (A UP will not cover Croatia, Spain or Poland as they have not signed up to the UPC Agreement.)

Protection in non-EU countries, including UK, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey, is available via conventional national validation of a granted European patent.

Protection in individual EU countries, including Croatia, Spain and Poland, also continues to be available via national validation of a granted European patent.

Renewal fees for UPs are payable at the EPO.

Renewal of a UP will be more expensive than renewing three (3) individual national validations of an EP patent but will be significantly cheaper than renewing five (5) or more individual national validations.

An EPO opposition can still be filed within nine (9) months of grant of a European patent for which a request for unitary effect has been filed.

*Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden.

The key features of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

The UPC has exclusive jurisdiction in litigation involving UPs.  Judgments are enforceable in all EU countries signed-up to the UPC Agreement.

The UPC also has jurisdiction over “classical” European patents that have are granted and which are validated in at least one EU country that has signed-up to the UPC Agreement.

However, there is a transitional period of at least seven (7) years from the opening of the court in 2023 during which a patentee may “opt out” a granted European patent from the court’s jurisdiction.  Opting-out will mean that a European patent will not be vulnerable to central revocation by the UPC but will deprive a patentee of the possibility of central enforcement of the patent in all EU countries signed up to the UPC Agreement. Opting out is possible for “classical” European patents validated nationally in at least one EU country that has signed up to the UPC Agreement. It is not possible to opt-out a unitary patent, as the UPC has exclusive jurisdiction for UPs.

Opting out from UPC jurisdiction

An “opt-out” must be filed with the Registry of the UPC (not at the EPO). There is no official fee for requesting an opt-out.
Only the current owner(s) of the European patent (or their authorised representative) can file an opt-out.

The opt-out must apply for all EPC states and is possible for “classical” European patents validated nationally in at least one EU country that has signed up to the UPC Agreement. It is not possible to opt-out a unitary patent, as the UPC has exclusive jurisdiction for UPs.

An opt-out can be withdrawn once, i.e. an opted-out patent can be opted back into the jurisdiction of the UPC once only and there is no official fee for doing so.
Whether or not to opt-out should be considered on a case by case basis. However, in general, if cost reduction and possibility of pan-EU enforcement outweighs the risk of central revocation, it may make sense not to opt out. On the other hand, if the risk of central revocation outweighs the benefits of cost reduction and pan-EU enforcement, it may make sense to opt out.

More information regarding opting-out may be found here.

How Dehns can support you

Dehns is able to obtain UPs and act on your behalf before the UPC. Dehns has a large team of around 80 representatives authorised to act before the Unified Patent Court and we have experience of conducting matters before that court and its own Court of Appeal.

Dehns’ experts can guide you through the considerations and implications of whether or not to opt out any granted or pending European patents, in addition to advising on UPC revocation and infringement proceeding. You can find more information on our dispute resolution services by visiting our dedicated page.

If you require more detailed advice, or have any questions, please contact us at mail@dehns.com.

Frequently asked questions about the UPC and Unitary Patents

A Unitary Patent is a cost-effective way of achieving patent protection in 4+ EU countries. Coverage is currently available for Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden.

The examination process is the same for both. After grant, there is an official fee for requesting unitary effect and then a single renewal fee for UPs. This renewal fee is more expensive than renewing three (3) individual national validations of an EP patent but significantly cheaper than renewing an EP patent in five (5) or more national states.

Yes, the majority of our European Patent Attorneys who are based in the UK are qualified to act before the UPC and are registered as representatives.

 

The UPC offers a number of different local and regional divisions of the court. Some of these accept a local language, but they all accept English. In fact, over 50% of the proceedings currently pending are in English. For central revocation actions, the language is determined by the patent and >70% of European patents are published in English.

A main attraction of the court is the availability of a pan-EU injunction within a short timeframe ~ one year. Preliminary injunctions and other interim measures may also be sought in certain circumstances. In addition, the claimant may be granted remedies including damages or an account of profits, destruction or delivery-up of infringing goods, and an order for patent revocation. Costs recovery is also provided for the wining party.